Synodal Bishop Who is Going to Ordain Married Men Reveals in Interview How Synodalism is Becoming a Monster not even Leo XIV can Control

If you still think this “situation,” possibly the worst crisis in the Church’s history, is merely a phase that will blow over, then you need to take your head out of you-know-where.

Often, I guess as a form of consolation and to inspire myself, I like to meditate on previous crises in the Church. I try to put myself in the shoes of men like St. Athanasius during the Arian crisis, or those of the heroes of the Vendée resistance, and imagine what they felt, what they thought, and what their inner responses were.

I suppose we no longer have to wonder what it feels like to be alive in a time of crisis in the Church. Currently the true Church has just about been driven underground, a sophisticated campaign of persecution against Catholics from both inside and outside its structures is in full swing, and the lunatic enemies of Christ have taken over everywhere.

If you still think this “situation”, possibly the worst crisis in the Church’s history, is merely a phase that will blow over, then you need to take your head out of you-know-where.

In early April, “Bishop” Johan Bonny of Antwerp announced his intention to ordain married men to the priesthood in his diocese by 2028. Although this is bad enough in itself, it is not surprising coming from a synodal heretic. What I would rather advise my readers is to take note of what he said in a subsequent interview published over Easter weekend on the Marxist, anti-Catholic news platform Religion Digital. This gives us not only another glimpse into the Synodal Pandora’s box and what is coming out of it, but also a good insight into the dark minds of the men now claiming to be the Catholic hierarchy.

I will bet my last dollar that Bonny’s reasoning, as revealed in the interview, is going to become the standard argument for whatever abomination the Synodalists want to commit and create in the name of Catholicism. As we delve into some of his answers, I want you to note how, just as in the myth of Pandora’s box, once opened it could not be closed again, the revolution that has been set in motion over the past few centuries—especially since 1962—can no longer be contained by the very men who are its greatest proponents.

Bonny wastes no time in defending his position as a faithful implementation of the recent synodal process. And, let us be honest, he is right. The architects of the modernist synodal heresy wanted to play God and usurp God, but now do not have the power of God to rein in their little minions. He argues that urgency, pastoral necessity, and broad consensus now demand concrete action rather than continued theological reflection. I guess the heresiarchs have had their fill of “discerning” and now want to get their hands dirty with the real work of slaughter. It is clear the chickens are coming home to roost, as he further suggests that even potential resistance from Rome should not lead to delay, and he outlines additional innovations regarding new ministries and expanded roles for women.

This is a clear window into the deeper logic now animating synodality—a logic that, once examined, reveals the parasite at work within the structures of the Catholic Church.

“Bishop” Bonny begins by diagnosing a real problem: a severe shortage of priests in Western Europe. But his analysis is completely (and intentionally) off the mark, as he blames “structural problems.” Absent is any serious reflection on the roots of this decline, such as the erosion of catechesis, the weakening of faith, the loss of sacrificial understanding in the priesthood, the secularization and Islamification that have engulfed Europe, and, most importantly, the Second Vatican Council and the deplorable false religion it spawned.

No, for Bonny, the priesthood is merely an administrative function that must be filled to keep parishes operating, and therefore celibacy is fair game if it means more administrators.

The big reveal of the rotten synodal mind comes when the interviewer asks Bonny why the matter is so urgent. He replies as follows:

“When a child is hungry, it cannot be said, ‘We will think about it and maybe find a solution next week.’ No, the child is hungry and you have to feed him right now. We have been waiting for 30 or 40 years for more priests. The urgency is there, the consensus is there, and there are also some candidates. In addition, we are in the implementation phase of the World Synod. Now it is no longer about thinking or studying, but about acting. The bishops must leave behind abstract hypotheses.”

This “hungry child” analogy, central to his argument, is deeply misleading.

The Eucharist is indeed the Bread of Life, and the faithful have a right to the sacraments. But the conclusion drawn here is that any obstacle to sacramental access must be immediately removed, even if it involves overturning longstanding ecclesial discipline.

This reasoning collapses the distinction between divine institution and human administration. The sacraments cannot be detached from the conditions Christ and His Church have established. Urgency does not grant authority to alter those conditions at will.

And here is what Satan is actually aiming for: if consistently applied, this logic would justify virtually any change, provided it is framed as meeting an “immediate pastoral need.” And anything can be twisted into that. Why not female priests, then? After all, isn’t it a “pastoral need”? Homosexuals want to get married? It becomes a “pastoral need.” You get the idea. Whatever nightmare their sinful, evil hearts can dream up, they will dress up as an “immediate pastoral need,” and no one will be able to stop them—not even their own false pope.

What we see here is the transformation of synodality from a process of “discernment” into a mechanism for activism. Bonny explicitly dismisses further theological reflection as an “excuse,” insisting that the time for action has arrived.

And what is being set aside? The Church’s careful, centuries-long reflection on priestly celibacy, the unity of discipline, and the role of Rome in safeguarding universal norms.

Do not mistake his impatience with “thinking” for a virtue. It is an expression of a lust for the destruction of Catholicism. Like sharks in a feeding frenzy, these men can no longer contain themselves.

We also notice that throughout the interview, “Bishop” Bonny repeatedly appeals to “broad consensus” among the “faithful” and “bishops” in favor of ordaining married men. He even claims never to have encountered a bishop who would refuse such a possibility if permitted. Bonny is telling us in no uncertain terms that “broad consensus” is all that is needed for legitimacy. The synodal religion is, in other words, Catholicism reduced to the slime of majority opinion—a poll of perdition.

And here is what Prevost and his coterie of cowards must take note of: the genie cannot be put back into the bottle, and it is rapidly transforming into a devouring, screeching banshee. When the interviewer asks Bonny how he will deal with a “no” from Apostate Rome, he reveals his stance toward potential opposition from the Unholy See. While acknowledging the “authority” of Leo XIV, he leaves open the possibility of proceeding regardless:

“We’ll see in 2028… Waiting is not appropriate for a synodal Church.”

The ambiguity of the answer is very revealing, as it contains the implication that local pastoral necessity may justify pressing forward even without clear approval. The Synodal Church will increasingly become a no-holds-barred free-for-all, where each bishop or region feels empowered to anticipate or effectively force change as they see fit and deem “essential.”

In defending his proposal, Bishop Bonny draws a distinction between what is “essential” and what is not:

“The essential is the sacrament of Holy Orders. Whether the person is married or not is not essential.”

While technically correct in a narrow sense—celibacy is a discipline, not a dogma—this argument ignores the profound theological and historical significance of that discipline in the Latin Church (as opposed to its pretend version, the Synodal Church).

Celibacy is not an arbitrary rule but is intimately linked to the priest’s configuration to Christ, his total self-gift, and his witness to the Kingdom. To dismiss it as non-essential in practice is to reduce it to a mere administrative detail. This reasoning opens the door to reclassifying other long-standing disciplines—and eventually teachings—as negotiable. And that, my dear friends, is the endgame.

In the future, each synodal parish will have its own unique set of beliefs, doctrines, and disciplines that will differ from its neighboring parish, and which will change every time a new priest arrives or whenever the congregation becomes enamored with whatever the latest spiritual flavor is. And keep in mind that these spiritual flavors will not be limited to Christianity.

Welcome to Protestantism on steroids, synodal style.

The slippery slope becomes clear when in the interview the pretend-bishop himself connects the ordination of married men to broader questions such as the creation of new ministries with quasi-liturgical rites, the possibility of women’s ordination in the future, and symbolic practices that closely resemble sacramental actions.

He admits that these are “next steps,” even if not immediate ones.

This is Pandora’s box in full view. Once the principle is accepted that structures must adapt rapidly to perceived needs, there is no clear boundary, and each change generates momentum for the next. This is how revolution works, as I have explained before. Each revolution contains within it the seed of the next. Not only that, each revolution continuously raises the level of extremism, which then becomes the goal the next revolution must surpass.

This interview is more than a local proposal by some heretic in a faraway country. This is your Synodal Church in action, where authority is now a local initiative, consensus replaces tradition, and pragmatism trumps theology.

But here is the saddest news of all:

If you are one of the people who accepted and is accepting the Second Vatican Council as legitimate— who accepts the demoltion of the liturgy, the abominable practice of “Eucharistic ministers,” “altar girls,” interfaith “Catholic” prayer meetings, and every other anti-Catholic innovation—you can huff and puff as much as you want and say that you will never accept “Bishop” Bonny’s arguments and his way of doing things.

You are lying to us and to yourselves.

You have accepted the above. You have accepted synodality. You will accept married priests. You will accept female priests. You will accept gay marriages in your “church.” You will accept the removal of the Blessed Virgin. You will accept every new filthy innovation because if you haven’t said enough is enough by now (and acted!), you never will.

You are part of the problem. Enjoy your Synodal Church.

Our Lady, Co-redemptrix, pray for us…

Our Lady, Mediatrix of all Graces, pray for us…

Viva Christo Rey!

ALSO READ:

Archbishop Wants to Change Church Doctrine in the Name of a Confused, Self-Contradicting Version of the Holy Ghost

The Catholic Church, Popes, and Scripture Differ with Synodal Leader on God Rejecting the Prayers of Leaders Who Wage War

Before We Go to the Cross, Consider…

Vatican Asks the Last Remaining European Catholic Confessional State Not to Be Too Catholic

Further Thoughts on the Validity of Post-Conciliar Papal Claimants