The rainbow god vomits on Mother Church – again
The Jubilee LGBT pilgrimage and Fiducia Supplicans cannot be viewed in isolation; they are part of an ongoing scandal within the Church, in which pastoral practice is divorced from doctrine.
They just can’t help themselves, can they?
The modernist masonic cabal which has entrenched itself in the Vatican, recently continued its attempt to destroy Christ’s One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church with yet another sodomite-inspired scandal, when it was announced that the 2025 Jubilee will include an LGBTQ pilgrimage.
On top of that, we were reminded this week, that one of the men who was made a new cardinal on 8 December, made satanic and blasphemous comments in 2013 in which he likened homosexual acts to Christ’s self-giving in the Eucharist.
Yip, campers, that is where faithful Catholics find themselves as we enter the final year of the first quarter of the 21st Century!
Pope Francis’ approval of the upcoming LGBT pilgrimage—titled “Church, Home for All, LGBT+ Christians and Other Existential Frontiers”— once again demonstrated the hierarchy’s stark and troubling departure from traditional Catholic teaching. Scheduled for September 2025, this event, spearheaded by the Italian LGBT advocacy group Tenda di Gionata (TDG), will feature a prayer vigil and procession through St. Peter’s Basilica. TDG’s record includes blasphemous and deeply offensive imagery—such as depictions of Christ with a rainbow halo and even as a transgender figure—that not only contradict sacred truth but also mock the sacred person of Our Lord.
According to a report in Il Messagerro, the church of the Gesu, mother church of the Jesuit order and home to the relics of St Francis Xavier (he must be turning in his grave), will be the “promoter of welcoming LGBTQ+ pilgrims, their parents, workers and all those who gravitate to these rainbow associations”.
The pilgrimage, reportedly initiated by Jesuit Father Pino Piva (a Jesuit? Really? Wow, I didn’t see that coming!) and endorsed by influential Church figures like Cardinal Matteo Zuppi (a man rumoured to be a strong contender to be the successor of Pope Francis) and Jesuit Superior General Father Arturo Sosa (another Jesuit?! No way, you are lying to me!), reveals the extent to which doctrinal clarity has been replaced with moral ambiguity. While Pope Francis frames such initiatives as “pastoral accompaniment,” this justification rings hollow when weighed against the unchanging truths of Catholic teaching.
The Jubilee LGBT pilgrimage and Fiducia Supplicans cannot be viewed in isolation; they are part of an ongoing scandal within the Church, in which pastoral practice is divorced from doctrine. From the German Synodal Way’s open defiance of Catholic teaching to bishops in Belgium and elsewhere offering formal blessings for same-sex couples, these actions reveal a coordinated attempt to reshape the Church’s moral teachings under the pretense of inclusion. Pope Francis’ repeated gestures, such as his infamous “Who am I to judge?” remark and his praise of pro-LGBT organizations, further embolden this movement.
By approving same-sex blessings, the Vatican opened the door to confusion and scandal, legitimizing practices that contradict the Catechism of the Catholic Church. The Catechism clearly states that homosexual acts are “intrinsically disordered” and “contrary to the natural law,” calling those with same-sex attractions to a life of chastity. Yet Fiducia Supplicans implicitly diminishes this moral clarity under the guise of “pastoral sensitivity,” much as the Jubilee LGBT pilgrimage now elevates a group that openly rejects Church teaching. These efforts share a common theme: a willingness to accommodate secular demands at the cost of doctrinal integrity.
The roots of this crisis go deeper still, exemplified by the persistent scandal surrounding new Cardinal, Timothy Radcliffe and his controversial writings on homosexuality. In his 2013 contribution to the Anglican Pilling Report, Radcliffe shockingly likened same-sex acts to Christ’s sacrificial self-gift in the Eucharist. Though Radcliffe later attempted to clarify his words, the damage was done. To compare disordered and abominable acts—acts that the Church teaches cannot be “unitive” or “procreative”—to the sinless offering of Our Lord in the Eucharist is not only theologically incoherent but blasphemous.
Radcliffe’s subsequent pastoral approach, including his role in the notorious “Soho Masses,” reflects a broader pattern of moral ambiguity. During these Masses, aimed at the LGBT community, the focus has been on “welcome” rather than the call to conversion. Radcliffe’s own admission—“I don’t ask them what they do in bed”—demonstrates the refusal to address sin as sin. This pastoral negligence, framed as “accompaniment,” echoes the ethos of Fiducia Supplicans, where truth is replaced by a superficial kindness that ultimately deprives individuals of the authentic care they need for their spiritual salvation. In other words, damning them to hell.
(This sort of nonsense helps to elevate one to the hierarchical position of cardinal in the post-conciliar synodal church. Something that would have “elevated” one to the burning stake in the Church of yore…)
This steady erosion of doctrine has left faithful Catholics disoriented and betrayed. The Church, tasked with proclaiming the Gospel “in season and out of season” (2 Timothy 4:2), now appears to accommodate a spirit of the age that rejects God’s design for human sexuality. As the 1986 CDF letter, issued under Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, warned, failure to uphold the truth in matters of sexuality is neither compassionate nor pastoral: “Only what is true can ultimately be pastoral.” Silence, ambiguity, and accommodation do not free souls; they enslave them to sin.
The symbolism of the upcoming Jubilee pilgrimage cannot be overlooked. A Jubilee year is a time of renewal, penance, and conversion, yet this event [the LGBTQ pilgrimage] threatens to undermine its very essence. The Holy Door, a sacred threshold of grace, risks becoming a spectacle for ideologies that reject repentance and sanctity. The pilgrimage sends a message that sin can be celebrated, that disorder can be sanctified, and that the Church’s teachings are open to negotiation.
For faithful Catholics, this is nothing less than a spiritual betrayal. The Church’s mission is to lead souls to Christ, who said, “Go, and sin no more” (John 8:11). The growing embrace of LGBT advocacy within the Church—whether through pilgrimages, same-sex blessings, or morally ambiguous rhetoric—abandons this mission in favour of worldly approval. It is a capitulation to the “rainbow god” of sexual confusion, which vomits on the holiness and purity of Mother Church.
This is of course not the first time the Church has faced such challenges. Throughout history, she has been beset by heresy, corruption, and compromise, yet the promise of Christ remains: “The gates of hell shall not prevail” (Matthew 16:18). Faithful Catholics must respond with courage, clarity, and unwavering fidelity to the truth. The Catechism’s call to chastity for those with same-sex attractions is not cruel; it is liberating. True pastoral care does not confirm individuals in their sin but calls them to the fullness of life in Christ.
As the Church marches toward the 2025 Jubilee, the faithful must stand firm. We must pray for the conversion of the pope and his fellow errant shepherds, for the restoration of doctrinal clarity, and for the purification of the Bride of Christ. The rainbow god may continue to vomit, but we must hold fast to the eternal truths entrusted to the Church. In the face of compromise, we must declare, with the Apostle Paul: “Stand firm and hold fast to the traditions” (2 Thessalonians 2:15).
The Church cannot serve two masters. To proclaim Christ in His fullness requires fidelity to His teachings, no matter how unpopular they may be. True charity demands that we reject false compassion, false inclusion, and false ideologies that lead souls astray. Mother Church, though battered and bruised, remains the ark of salvation. It is through unwavering adherence to the truth that she will continue her mission, even amidst the storms of modernity.
Ave Christus Rex!
Recognise and Resist!
ALSO READ:
A short reflection on Mary and the Immaculate Conception after watching the Netflix betrayal
How the Novus Ordo can shipwreck your faith: "If you hang around a barbershop long enough…"
Update: How you can help Pope Francis convert to Catholicism
The Great Dilemma (Part II): Finding shelter in Traditionalism
Mayan Mass: One step closer to fulfilling Bible prophecy and mystics’ dire warnings?
The Church is in as much (if not more) of a crisis now as in the 1970s when they restricted the Latin Mass. Rome has departed from the Faith. If the SSPX consecrates new bishops without permission, remember that we are still the faithful upholding tradition, contending for the faith, and Rome is not.
I'm a West Point grad from '81 and I know the importance of military banners. We are losing souls because we fail to show unity of command under Christ the King.