Progressive Theologian Explains How Radical Modernists Should Get Their Way in the Synodal Church (But It Won't Work for Traditional Catholics!)
This strategy has repeatedly succeeded over the past several decades.
For more than half a century, the antichrist cabal planted by Judeo-Masonic forces in the Roman Catholic Church has taken a wrecking ball to dogma, doctrine, and authority.
It is therefore hard to say whether they secretly celebrate when they see how relativistic anarchy has become the guiding principle of their new demon religion, or whether even they lie awake at night slightly concerned about how their spiritual Marxist project has become a Frankensteinian juggernaut.
Regardless, in a recent interview, revolutionary agitator—sorry, pastoral theologian—Paul Zulehner gave a rare glimpse into the filthy minds of those who have turned rebellion against Christ into a religion.
The interview touched on the latest dispute over lay preaching at Mass, which once again received attention after the German Bishops’ Conference sought “clarification” from the Vatican regarding the practice. Synodal Rome, which has become a spiritual whoredom where everything goes, surprisingly reaffirmed that the homily during Mass is reserved to a bishop, priest, or deacon. This is, of course, not a new prohibition, nor is it merely a local preference, but a universal norm of the Latin Church that has been repeatedly confirmed.
But our fiendish friend Zulehner was not only critical of this little restrictive inconvenience, which surely won’t last; he also had some diabolically simple advice for those who find even liberal Rome’s last few tepid rules a nuisance.
Zulehner lamented that the German bishops had approached the Vatican at all. In his view, “The German Bishops’ Conference may have been too optimistic when it sent the request to Rome. It would have been better to simply trust the developments in the parishes and not ask anything at all.”
This is, of course, hardly a new strategy, but quite an honest admission of the long-standing approach of the revolutionary postconciliar agents. For 61 years, the ambiguous doctrines of the Vatican II religion have repeatedly led to a free-for-all feast of satanic licentiousness: from abhorrent altar girls to the disgusting Eucharistic “ministers,” from Saturday evening Masses counting toward one’s Sunday obligation to priests facing the congregation. All of these were chaotic mutations of the new religion, in which man’s wickedness, under the guise of “human dignity,” has been elevated to the level of doctrine.
For decades, many progressive movements within the Church have operated according to precisely this principle. If Rome is likely to say no, do not ask. If Rome does say no, continue anyway. Allow the practice to spread locally until it becomes so widespread that opposition appears impractical or even impossible.
In the interview, Zulehner himself openly and shamelessly proposed this strategy by appealing to the history of female altar servers.
“They were also forbidden, but mostly continued to serve at the altar. Today, very few people object to women appearing as altar servers in the sanctuary.”
This was presented not as a cautionary tale, but as a model for future reform. The implication is unmistakable: the “ecclesiastical authority” (the Synodal Church has no authority, but let us pretend it does for the article’s sake) should simply be bypassed until reality on the ground forces the “Church” to accept what was once prohibited.
He continued: “Some things simply evolve. The attempts at control by Vatican authorities are now only partially effective.”
Wow. Say what you want about this enemy of the Catholic Church, but his brutal honesty is commendable. In one sentence, he both admits that evolution is the name of the synodal game and acknowledges that the Vatican has virtually no authority.
For men like Zulehner, rather than seeing fidelity to the Church’s laws as an obligation flowing from communion with Christ and His Church, authority must be treated as an obstacle whose effectiveness can gradually be undermined through persistent noncompliance.
Viva la Revolution!
This approach represents a profoundly satanic inversion of Catholic ecclesiology.
Authentic development within the Church does not mean disregarding legitimate authority until enough people have become accustomed to disobedience. Genuine development unfolds organically in continuity with apostolic tradition under the guidance of the Church’s Magisterium. It does not arise from calculated acts of resistance designed to pressure Rome into eventual acceptance.
But here we are. In the Synodal Church this strategy has repeatedly succeeded over the past several decades.
Whether the issue has been liturgical abuses, unauthorized blessings of sodomites, irregular sacramental practices, or doctrinal ambiguities, the pattern has been copied and pasted over and over again. Introduce the innovation locally and defend it as a pastoral necessity; allow it to become widespread; then argue that Rome must eventually recognize the “reality” already established in the parishes.
Zulehner beautifully sums up the strategy when he tells the interviewer that “It would have been better to simply trust the developments in the parishes and not ask anything at all.”
This was perhaps the most significant sentence in the entire interview. It amounts to an endorsement of governing by accomplished fact rather than by ecclesial communion.
But it is important to note that this highly successful formula works only in favor of the destroyers and not in favor of traditionalist factions such as the SSPX.
And why not?
Because Synodal Rome can tolerate anything—
EXCEPT CATHOLICISM.
Our Lady, Co-redemptrix, pray for us…
Our Lady, Mediatrix of all Graces, pray for us…
Viva Christo Rey!
Also Read:
Drama Continues as SSPX Files Canonical Recourse Against Vatican Decree
The Death of the “Pastoral Council” Argument and Its Serious Implications



Here’s a secret: if you want to push something in the Ape Church and the Roman Usurpers are hesitant, take a page from the American Bishops. Do what you want, lie about it, when Rome says STOP just say it’s longstanding custom, and voila! Permission. It’s how we got Communion in the hand.
“Some things simply evolve. The attempts at control by Vatican authorities are now only partially effective.”
And the blind sheep continue to tithe to a false church, while the remnant keeps the Faith, praying for their conversion. A narrow path.