30-Year-Old Document Resurfaces to Haunt “Cardinal” Fernández and Again Proves He Is a Heretic
The damning evidence appears in Fernández's concluding statement of the essay that appeared in 1995.
Every day, reasons pile up for why I will keep standing on my little soapbox, warning everyone to flee from the Synodal Church and the filthy religion it represents and promotes.
The Vatican continues its purge of those who have woken up to the fact that the Synodal Church is an enemy of Christ and Catholicism. First came reports that Rome might also designate ordinary Catholic folk who attend SSPX Masses as schismatics, and on June 24 the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith announced that Father Francisco José Vegara Cerezo had been dismissed from the clerical state. The priest, who belonged to the Diocese of Orihuela-Alicante in southeastern Spain, was subject to disciplinary proceedings initiated in 2024 after he publicly (and correctly) claimed that Pope Francis was guilty of heresy and rejected his legitimacy as pope. The Diocese of Orihuela-Alicante confirmed the outcome to the local publication Religión Confidencial.
But this is where it gets interesting and bizarre. The very next day, a report appeared in the media about a theological article written in 1995 by “Cardinal Porn,” a.k.a. Víctor Manuel Fernández, who currently serves as prefect of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, the Vatican office responsible for promoting and safeguarding Catholic doctrine.
The article, written 30 years ago and titled Romans 9–11: Grace and Predestination, examined St. Paul’s teaching on election, grace, and salvation in the Epistle to the Romans.
The damning evidence appears in Fernández’s concluding statement:
“I firmly believe that everyone will be saved; a belief that is not based on wishful thinking, nor on my compassion for men, but on what I know about God and his concrete plans thanks to his Revelation.”
Hardly surprising in the context that he is the henchman of two of the greatest heretics in the history of the Church, Bergoglio and Prevost, but still shocking that this is the man in charge of deciding who gets to be Catholic and who does not.
The Catholic Church teaches that God desires the salvation of all men and offers sufficient grace for salvation to all. At the same time, the Church teaches the reality of hell and the possibility of eternal separation from God for those who freely reject grace and die unrepentant.
The catechisms of the Catholic Church teaches that God predestines no one to hell, but it also affirms the existence of eternal punishment and the necessity of conversion and perseverance in grace.
In his article, Fernández argued that Romans chapters 9 through 11 should be interpreted in a way that modifies or reconsiders aspects of the traditional theological understanding of predestination, particularly as developed by St. Augustine.
Augustine’s teaching on grace exercised a major influence on later Catholic theology and was reflected in the teaching of the Second Council of Orange in 529. It also shaped the theology of St. Thomas Aquinas and later scholastic writers.
Fernández’s clearly gives greater emphasis to divine mercy than to traditional Catholic teaching on judgment, reprobation, and eternal punishment.
Some commentators asked whether the views expressed in the article remain those of Cardinal Fernández today and, if so, how they relate to the Church’s traditional teaching on grace, predestination, judgment, and salvation. But over here at Radical Fidelity, where God has given us senses and healthy intelligence, we can answer that question: his actions tell us he still holds heretical positions like these and worse.
Besides being tragically ridiculous, this statement from the Pornographer-in-Chief’s 1995 “theological” essay makes a mockery of Christ and His Passion.
The pervert Tucho needs to explain to us: if his statement is true, why did Christ have to die for our sins?
Like something out of a surrealist fantasy, Fernández now holds the Church’s highest doctrinal office after the “pope.” As I have said before, the whole synodal circus is so ridiculous and illegitimate that, if I had to pitch it to a publisher as a fictional novel, it would be rejected on the grounds of being completely implausible.
Yet, they want to insult faithful folks’ intelligence by expecting us to believe these clowns are the Catholic Church and its hierarchy.
Our Lady, Co-redemptrix, pray for us…
Our Lady, Mediatrix of all Graces, pray for us…
Viva Christo Rey!
Also Read:
Cardinal McElroy Leads Souls to Hell by Presiding Over Mass at LGBTQ Event
To Those Who Still Find Themselves in the Synodal Religion
Leo XIV, Kindly Tell Us Which Part of Your Abomination Do We Have to Agree With to Be “Included”?
Paragraphs 106 and 107 from the SSPX Profession of Catholic Faith seem to address Cardinal Fernandez’s statement, “106.I also reject that modern form of personalism which would assign to the Church the mission of safeguarding the dignity of the human person, and of establishing a universal fraternity upon the foundation of this allegedly common dignity of the human race — without making any distinction between, on the one hand, the true dignity of the Christian who renounces sin in order to live according to evangelical morality in the Catholic Church, and, on the other, the false dignity of those who, lost in error and vice, refuse the path of salvation.
107. I reject the falsification that flows from this, which tends to make the Church, if not the servant, at least the collaborator of the world in the realization of its own ideal: that of a purely earthly and temporal peace, founded upon a naturalistic perfecting of humanity, devoid of supernatural perspective. This ideal fosters the independence of man with regard to God, His law, truth, and the good; it implies contempt for the Social Kingship of Christ and for Christendom, and leads ultimately to atheism and the substitution of man for God.
““I firmly believe that everyone will be saved; a belief that is not based on wishful thinking, nor on my compassion for men, but on what I know about God and his concrete plans thanks to his Revelation.”
exactly when did God.. The Father.. The Almighty.. Creator of Heaven and Earth -cancel free will?