URGENT: The REAL aim of the synod has been accomplished… and no one noticed
On 27 October 2024, the “final” session of the Synod on Synodality concluded. With the release of the synod’s final document, one of the most significant events in the Church’s history occurred.
Writing this, I am faced with an interesting dilemma.
On the one hand, this might be the most important article I have ever written in my career as a journalist, and on the other, I pray I am wrong.
I yearn to be wrong, but like so many others, I can no longer deny the facts.
Normally, those in the social media sphere would ask that you “like” the article and subscribe. I am not going to ask that. What I do ask is that if this humble piece of writing does speak to you, you will share it with as many other Catholics as possible, so they too can be vigilant henceforth and understand the dire situation the Faithful find themselves in.
Here goes. I hope and pray that I can communicate this in an ordered, structured, and simple way, so you, the dear reader, can join the dots for yourself.
At the outset I want to point out that this is not an attempt to cover all the failures of Pope Francis’ pontificate, much has been written on the subject and they are too numerous to cover here. It suffices to say that there was a multitude of incidents and statements that set off more than alarm bells and with hindsight pointed out exactly where we were heading.
I am also going to assume that the reader does have some knowledge of the problematic elements of the Second Vatican Council. I do believe though that even without the latter knowledge, the evil we face will be clear.
On 27 October 2024, the “final” session of the Synod on Synodality concluded. With the release of the synod’s final document, one of the most significant events in the Church’s history occurred.
While the majority of good, orthodox, traditional Catholics were worried about what the document would say about hot-button issues such as female deacons, the LGBTQ+ agenda, and rumors of yet another “NEW new Mass”, they completely missed the point. See, these issues were never the aim of the Synod on Synodality.
The aim of the synod was to fundamentally change the operational structure of the Church, destroy the functioning of the hierarchy, and replace it with synodality. In other words, we are seeing in real-time an attempt to replace Christ’s Catholic Church with a new Synodal Church that is NOT Catholic.
To do this, the Magisterial authority had to be moved from the pope and bishops to the “consensus of the laity”. The aim is that going forward, through the synodal process, truth will be democratically voted on. This is truly evil.
For the first time in history, a pope did not receive the final synodal document, process it, and then issue his own apostolic exhortation. Instead, Pope Francis signed the document as is, thus promulgating it and making it part of the ordinary Magisterium. At least that is according to Pope Francis.
But how do we know that this was what took place?
The answer lies in an important document from 2018 entitled Episcopalis communio. This document explains exactly what the Synod on Synodality will be and how it will function.
In Article 18 of this document, we find the following:
“Art. 18
Delivery of the Final Document to the Roman Pontiff
· §1. Once the approval of the members has been obtained, the Final Document of the Assembly is presented to the Roman Pontiff, who decides on its publication.
If it is expressly approved by the Roman Pontiff, the Final Document participates in the ordinary Magisterium of the Successor of Peter.
· §2. If the Roman Pontiff has granted deliberative power to the Synod Assembly, according to the norm of canon 343 of the Code of Canon Law, the Final Document participates in the ordinary Magisterium of the Successor of Peter once it has been ratified and promulgated by him.
In this case, the Final Document is published with the signature of the Roman Pontiff together with that of the members.”
Pope Francis, was setting the stage for what happened this past Saturday, six years ago.
The next question that needs to be answered is what exactly is meant by the “ordinary Magisterium”?
The Ordinary Magisterium of the Catholic Church refers to the regular and consistent teaching authority of the pope and bishops on matters of faith and morals, conveyed in everyday teachings rather than through formal declarations or solemn pronouncements (which are part of the Extraordinary Magisterium). This teaching authority is exercised by the bishops in union with the pope, especially in their day-to-day instructions, pastoral letters, encyclicals, homilies, catechesis, and other forms of teaching that communicate Church doctrine.
Ordinary Magisterium teachings become especially significant when bishops worldwide teach a doctrine consistently and universally over time.
It is important to note the two words “consistently” and “universally”. It must be taught by all, always. This means even if all the bishops currently did teach that say for e.g. women can become deacons, it still does not meet the “consistently” requirement. Bishops did not teach this 500 or a 1000 years ago, therefore it cannot be part of the ordinary Magisterium.
The next question is what authority does the “synod fathers” call on in the document, to legitimize the synod, and more importantly the eventual fruits of the synod?
The first way they try to create authority is by claiming they have authority to teach on faith and morals based on the sense of the faithful (sensus fidelium).
In paragraph 4 of final document it says “This call [synodality] is based on a shared baptismal identity. It is rooted in the diversity of contexts in which the Church is present and finds unity in the one Father, the one Lord and the one Spirit”. (Note, not the Holy Spirit of Holy Ghost)
This “shared baptismal identity” is how they are attempting to incorporate Protestants into the synodal process. Ever since the Second Vatican Council, the Church has been teaching a watered-down version of extra Ecclesiam nulla salus (no salvation outside the Church), by claiming that mere baptism by correct formula makes you part of the Catholic Church. This is of course a perversion, as many more criteria need to be met to be part of the Catholic Faith, including sharing, profession, and practice of the whole Catholic Faith.
In paragraph 5 it says, “The entire synodal journey took place in the light of the conciliar magisterium” (Second Vatican Council). Note how it is not on the whole Magisterium of the Church, but only the “conciliar Magisterium” they rely on for authority.
Later on in the same paragraph we also find the following little ditty, “the synodal journey is indeed putting into practice what the Council [Second Vatican Council) taught about the Church as Mystery and Church as People of God” and “the synodal journey constitutes an authentic further act of reception of the Council”.
Clearly, they are finishing what the Second Vatican Council started. A total departure from the faith and the creation of a new church, the Synodal Church, which they will raise among the ruins of the Roman Catholic Church. Like the masonic Phoenix rising from the ashes. Ordo ab Chao.
[An important note here: The phrase “People of God” that pops up everywhere nowadays, is an attempt to include everyone under the Catholic umbrella, regardless of whether they believe what Catholics believe or not. Ultimately the aim is to not only include perversions of Christianity as found in Protestantism but also the pagan idolatrous religions of the world]
Paragraph 9 then shows us that synodality is here to stay. It reads, “The synodal process does not conclude with the end of the current Assembly of the Synod of Bishops, but also includes the implementation phase”. (By the way, this was NOT a synod of bishops, as it included laity, non-Catholics, and so-called “experts”, all deciding on “truth”).
In paragraph 22 they try to convince us that whatever sinful trash the synod cooks up, is legitimate because of the sensus fidei, “We refer to this as the sensus fidei. This consists in a certain connaturality with divine realities, based on the fact that, in the Holy Spirit, the baptised become “sharers in divine nature”. This participation enables the capacity of the faithful to grasp intuitively that which is in conformity with the truth of Revelation in the communion of the whole Church”.
This reeks of Gnosticism – no need for the hierarchical structure of bishops and the teaching Magisterium of the church, oh no, now the faithful (including non-Catholics by means of “shared baptismal identity”), can “intuitively” know the truth.
Later in the same paragraph, it says “the exercise of the sensus fidei must not be confused with public opinion. It is always in conjunction with the discernment of pastors at the different level of Church life, as the various interconnected phases of the synodal process demonstrated. The sensus fidei aims at reaching a consensus of the faithful (consensus fidelium) which constitutes “a sure criterion for determining whether a particular doctrine or practice belongs to the apostolic faith” and then they explicitly say in paragraph 23 “All Christians participate in the sensus fidei through baptism”.
What the actual heck?!
So, according to this, if all these groups, Catholics and non-Catholics, through the mechanisms of synodality get together, with bishops, and decide [democratically] on matters of faith and morals, it becomes part of the ordinary Magisterium of the Church. This is demonic nonsense, and again not remotely Catholic.
Sensus fidei must always align with historic teachings, the Magisterium, and Sacred Tradition and cannot be used as a tool of the tyrannical, sinful majority to justify doctrinal changes or innovations.
Now let us connect some dots.
· In 2020, Pope Francis removed the title of Vicar of Christ from the 2020 Annuario Pontificio, the official Vatican yearbook. (Afterwards, Matteo Bruni, director of the Vatican press office, weakly argued that unlike in 2006, when Pope Benedict XVI had the title “Patriarch of the West” removed from the list, this time “there has been no suppression” of a title. If this was an isolated incident, one might have been able to let it slide but if we take a global look at the past 11 years it seems that it fits perfectly into what appears to be the ‘long game’ that has been played since at least the 1800s.)
· In 2019, in Abu Dhabi, Pope Francis signed a joint statement with Islamic leaders that says, “The pluralism and the diversity of religions, colour, sex, race, and language are willed by God in His wisdom, through which He created human beings.”
· On 13 September 2024 Pope Francis told an audience in Singapore, “Every religion is a way to arrive at God. There are different languages to arrive at God, but God is God for all. And how is God, God for all? We are all sons and daughters of God” and “There is only one God and each of us has a language to arrive at God. Sikh, Muslim, Hindu, Christian, they are different paths. […]”
· At the start of the 2024 session of the Synod on Synodality, the architects announce seven new “sins” of which one is “The sin against synodality, the lack of listening, communion, and participation by all”. After all, a new religion needs new sins.
· By signing the final synodal document as it was presented to him, in the light of Article 18 of Episcopalis communio, Pope Francis has handed over the teaching authority to the ‘faithful’ in the Church. He has entrenched the “uncatholic” mechanisms of synodality into the Magisterium and henceforth Catholics must believe and submit to whatever is born from this evil invention, as it has now become part of the Magisterium. Thus, in the future matters of faith and morals will not so much be decided on by the pope and bishops, but by the “faithful”( as defined by a definition that now includes non-Catholics too).
Add to this the constant, intentional, and progressive dismantling of the Faith that has been taking place since the Second Vatican Council.
Can you see it yet?
And then finally, this chilling bit of theatrics.
On 2 October, the start of the final session of the Synod on Synodality, Pope Francis became the first Pope since 1974, to venerate St. Peter’s chair. The photo of Pope Francis venerating the chair went viral. The “Seat of St. Peter” is of course also the symbolic title for the papacy.
Did Pope Francis, through this gesture, signal that he is handing over papal and Magisterial authority to the anti-Christ, anti-Catholic god of synodality?
Also Read:
Dilexit Nos: Dangerous silence and other concerns with Pope Francis’ latest encyclical
Are these the two letters most hated by traditional Catholics?
MUST READ: Stunning results of largest-ever survey of lay Catholics released
A guide to guerilla-traditionalism in the Novus Ordo parish
Radical Roundup: Bring back the Inquisition, all is forgiven
Thank you for your thoughtful comment. Christus vincet! Christus regnat! Christus imperat!
Oh thank you for this! What a thoughtful and meticulously written essay. Thank you for highlighting the “low points” of Bergoglio’s evil false papacy (dark pope prophesied by St. Malachi) and for explaining in plain terms the present “synodal” slaughter of the Magisterium.
The Church has been destroyed and replaced by a synodal church as you said, which we must avoid with our very souls at stake. The faithful Catholics must cling tightly to the traditions we carry deeply within our hearts. We have no “head” to shepherd us, besides the Good Shepherd Himself (Come Lord Jesus! In glory!)
Bergoglio, the anti-Christic false successor of St. Peter (who himself acknowledges that he is not the Vicar of Christ) has handed the Church over to the wolves and waywards, just as Christ was handed over to the Jews by Pilate. Bergoglio is the worse kind of traitor (and he is fond of Judas Iscariot… it is sick and twisted).
To say that any religion you choose is a “language” leading to God is a satanic lie. Bergoglio completely denies the supreme truth of Jesus Christ being God, who said “No one comes to the Father except through me,” and the Holy Eucharist, which Christ gave us and requires us to partake in order to get to Heaven. Denying Christ = anti-Christ.
We are at the end of time. The Bride of Christ’s passion has been completed.
Now we await the Second Coming and can urgently note its imminence… and the preceding Warning… especially in light of the Garabandal prophecy the Blessed Virgin Mary gave to Conchita regarding an “important synod”; Melanie of La Salette’s message that Rome would become the seat of the anti-Christ; and Pope Leo’s message that Satan would have more power for the next 100 years (which has expired).
Mary said the cup of inequity is overflowing. Indeed it is, and many souls will be lost in this synodal stupidity.
Thank you again for the article. I have saved it to my Home Screen with its own button so I can refer back to it whenever I want.
May God bless and keep you, for all eternity!